[PPL-devel] [CLooG-dev] 'make check; errors in ppl-0.10.2 and 'gcc'

Sergei Steshenko sergstesh at gmail.com
Thu Aug 26 23:15:46 CEST 2010


Another piece of info I forgot to mention.

In the end I need to build gcc-4.4.4. I am building it in two stages
in addition to whatever stages used by 'gcc' build mechanism itself.

First I build gcc-4.4.4 without 'cloog', then using this clogg-less
gcc-4.4.4 I build 'cloog' and its dependencies, and then having built
'cloog' I build the final gcc-4.4.4 with 'cloog' - still using the
cloog-less gcc-4.4.4.

So now you know the gory details of the 'gcc' I'm using to build the stuff :).

Again, IIRC, ppl-0.11 builds just fine using this scheme, but
ppl-0.10.2 produces 'make check' errors we are discussing in this
thread.

Thanks,
  Sergei.

On 8/27/10, Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/26/10, Roberto Bagnara <bagnara at cs.unipr.it> wrote:
>> On 08/25/10 21:21, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>> On 8/25/10, Sebastian Pop<sebpop at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>> I think that this is more relevant to be posted to the PPL mailing list
>>>> rather than the CLooG development list.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:38, sergstesh<sergstesh at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> while building ppl-0.10.2 I've noticed that 'make check' produces a
>>>>> number of errors (and ppl-0.11' 'make check' is
>>>>> clean IIRC).
>>>>>
>>>>> OTOH, 'gcc' uses ppl-0.10.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, are the 'make check' errors in ppl-0.10.2 significant and do they
>>>>> translate into 'gcc' bugs ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do not think that they would translate into gcc bugs.
>>>>
>>>>> If necessary, I can post screen output of 'make check' in question.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please send the error messages that you are seeing, together
>>>> with more information about the machine and OS that you are using.
>>>
>>> Please find 'make check' screen output attached.
>>>
>>> Error messages are apparently at the end, but maybe some other info is
>>> necessary, so I decided to attach the whole file.
>>
>> Dear Sergei,
>>
>> as Sebastian anticipated, we need more information about the machine and
>> OS you are using.  We also need to know the versions of GCC, GMP and
>> GLPK.
>> The problem shown by the log file you attached concerns ppl_lpsol, an
>> utility using the MIP_Problem class via the C interface of the PPL
>> (the same interface used by GCC).  In contrast, the same log file shows
>> that testing via the C++ interface in tests/MIP_Problem/ succeeds.
>> Looking forward to receive more information,
>>
>>     Roberto
>>
>> --
>> Prof. Roberto Bagnara
>> Applied Formal Methods Laboratory
>> Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy
>> http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/
>> mailto:bagnara at cs.unipr.it
>>
>
> This is the info:
>
> "
> uname -a
> Linux amdam2 2.6.27.48-0.2-default #1 SMP 2010-07-29 20:06:52 +0200
> i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
> "
>
> - this is 32 bit SUSE-11.1 in simple English.
>
> Regarding versions - I am building as much as possible from sources
> with a tool of mine, so the versions can be seen in the attached
> autogenerated  'config_wrapper.sh' script used to run 'confugure'.
>
> I have also attached 'configure' screen output - please see it in
> 'configure.log' file.
>
> Thanks,
>   Sergei.
>



More information about the PPL-devel mailing list