[PPL-devel] [GIT] ppl/ppl(master): One obsolete item removed. Other items partially scheduled.

Roberto Bagnara bagnara at cs.unipr.it
Sat Apr 25 14:49:23 CEST 2009


Module: ppl/ppl
Branch: master
Commit: 9037c88e5adb824dc896eeb3f65d7167d1536063
URL:    http://www.cs.unipr.it/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ppl/ppl.git;a=commit;h=9037c88e5adb824dc896eeb3f65d7167d1536063

Author: Roberto Bagnara <bagnara at cs.unipr.it>
Date:   Sat Apr 25 14:48:38 2009 +0200

One obsolete item removed.  Other items partially scheduled.

---

 TODO |   63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 97a262f..c57a6cb 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -38,21 +38,6 @@ Enhancements for PPL 0.11 or later versions
   of the simplex solver.
 - Complete the implementation of the --enable-check configure option.
   Explain it in README.configure.
-- Make the library thread-safe.
-- Find a way to let the GMP and checked-int versions of the PPL coexist
-  so as to allow using them in the same application.
-- Provide methods computing approximations of the integer convex hull
-  of semantic domains for the case where we are only interested in integral
-  solutions (as is the case, e.g., in many program analyses).  Then
-  cutting-plane methods (Gomory, Chvatal, ...) allow to shrink polyhedra
-  still not losing any integral solution.
-  See http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Documentation/bibliography#NemhauserW88
-  Check the work by Kent Andersen and Gerard Cornuejols on
-  reduce-and-split cuts.
-- Consider the addition of "constraint-only" methods (e.g., computing
-  projections and upper bounds using the MIP solver).
-- Consider extending the MIP solver to handle Parametric Integer
-  Programming.
 - Ensure the tests in tests/MIP_Problem/* cover every line of
   code in MIP_Problem.*.
 - Define functions rem() and remp() to compute the remainder of division
@@ -92,6 +77,37 @@ Enhancements for PPL 0.11 or later versions
   is the one needed by users: in particular, see if it should take as
   an argument a generator system, instead of an abstract element.
 - Provide a generic implementation for the `widening with tokens'.
+- Implement the extrapolation operators defined in HenzingerH95
+  and HenzingerPW01.
+- Implement void Polyhedron::envelope_assign(const Polyhedron& y).
+- Provide support for strict inequalities in MIP problems.
+- Pointset_Powerset and Partially_Reduced_Product domains:
+  Improve and add to the existing methods for the powerset and product domains
+  so that they can be subdomains of themselves and of each other;
+  tidy the tests directories for these domains and ensure the code
+  with all likely instantiations is fully tested;
+  add the same functionaity to the C, Java, OCaml and Prolog interfaces.
+- Any_Pointset domain: check the interface for lacking or useless methods.
+
+
+Enhancements for PPL 0.12 or later versions
+===========================================
+
+- Make the library thread-safe.
+- Find a way to let the GMP and checked-int versions of the PPL coexist
+  so as to allow using them in the same application.
+- Provide methods computing approximations of the integer convex hull
+  of semantic domains for the case where we are only interested in integral
+  solutions (as is the case, e.g., in many program analyses).  Then
+  cutting-plane methods (Gomory, Chvatal, ...) allow to shrink polyhedra
+  still not losing any integral solution.
+  See http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Documentation/bibliography#NemhauserW88
+  Check the work by Kent Andersen and Gerard Cornuejols on
+  reduce-and-split cuts.
+- Consider the addition of "constraint-only" methods (e.g., computing
+  projections and upper bounds using the MIP solver).
+- Consider extending the MIP solver to handle Parametric Integer
+  Programming.
 - In the OK() methods, instead of having all those #ifndef NDEBUG,
   it is probably worthwhile to use a suitable defined `barf' stream
   that does the right thing.
@@ -99,14 +115,6 @@ Enhancements for PPL 0.11 or later versions
   "automatically".  Consider whether it is worth doing it.
 - Provide a single, generic implementation to replace all our status
   classes.
-- Implement the extrapolation operators defined in HenzingerH95
-  and HenzingerPW01.
-- Implement void Polyhedron::envelope_assign(const Polyhedron& y).
-- Provide support for strict inequalities in MIP problems.
-- See whether, using the techniques described in
-  ftp://ftp.ifor.math.ethz.ch/pub/fukuda/reports/polyunion001120.ps.gz
-  we can implement bool poly_hull_assign_if_exact(PH& p, const PH& q),
-  temporarily in algorithms.hh, more efficiently.
 - Provide optimized implementations of Polyhedron::expand_dimension()
   Polyhedron::fold_dimensions().
 - Add an implementation of Minkowski addition.  Check the algorithm
@@ -117,13 +125,7 @@ Enhancements for PPL 0.11 or later versions
     of convex polytopes.
     J. Symbolic Comput., 38(4):1261-1272, 2004.
 
-- Pointset_Powerset and Partially_Reduced_Product domains:
-  Improve and add to the existing methods for the powerset and product domains
-  so that they can be subdomains of themselves and of each other;
-  tidy the tests directories for these domains and ensure the code
-  with all likely instantiations is fully tested;
-  add the same functionaity to the C, Java, OCaml and Prolog interfaces.
-- Any_Pointset domain: check the interface for lacking or useless methods.
+
 
 Efficiency Issues
 =================
@@ -137,6 +139,7 @@ Efficiency Issues
 - Provide a better implementation of computing squares in MIP_Problem's
   steepest-edge to avoid big numbers.
 
+
 Debian packaging
 ================
 




More information about the PPL-devel mailing list