[PPL-devel] Re: C++ interface and long-longs
bhurt at spnz.org
Sun Oct 19 04:19:42 CEST 2003
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> For C++ is longlong is always available? If there's no risk of a
> missing type then I guess we could do something about conversions for
> mpz_class etc, even if initially they come out as slightly bloated
long long (two words) was added to the C99 standard- one of my beefs with
said standard. Most conformant C89 compilers don't support long long, or
at least didn't last time I checked (it's been a couple of years since I
had an account on a non-Linux box).
So now the question is: what does the GMP development community feel about
these older compilers?
More information about the PPL-devel